From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gubernik v. Steinberg Crotzer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 29, 1992
842 S.W.2d 587 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 61973.

December 29, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ROBERT W. SAITZ, JUDGE.

Sanford J. Gubernik, pro se.

James J. Hennelly, Lashley Baer, P.C., St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.


ORDER


Plaintiff appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition which attempted to allege malpractice by his former attorneys. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Gubernik v. Steinberg Crotzer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 29, 1992
842 S.W.2d 587 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Gubernik v. Steinberg Crotzer

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD J. GUBERNIK, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. STEINBERG CROTZER, ET AL.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Dec 29, 1992

Citations

842 S.W.2d 587 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)