Opinion
No. 68098
07-22-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original writ petition challenges a district court order granting a motion to enlarge the time in which to serve process.
Having considered the arguments set forth in the petition, we conclude that our intervention is unwarranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). Petitioner has not supported its petition with an appendix, as required by NRAP 21(a)(4), that includes "a copy of any order or opinion, parts of the record before the respondent judge, . . . or any other original document that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition." Without these documents this court is not in a position to grant extraordinary writ relief. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
The Faux Law Group
Beasley Law Group, PC
Eighth District Court Clerk