From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guarantee Abstract Co. v. Randolph

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 24, 1934
172 A. 909 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1934 —

Decided May 24, 1934.

For the defendant-appellant, William G. De Meza ( Winfield S. Angleman).

For the plaintiffs-respondents, King Vogt ( Harold A. Price).


The full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution (article 4, section 1) required the action taken in the court below. McKnett v. St. Louis and Santa Fe Railway Co., 54 Sup. Ct. 690.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Guarantee Abstract Co. v. Randolph

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 24, 1934
172 A. 909 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Guarantee Abstract Co. v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:GUARANTEE ABSTRACT COMPANY, A CORPORATION; BANK OF SARASOTA, E.P. JACKSON…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 24, 1934

Citations

172 A. 909 (N.J. 1934)
172 A. 909