From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grullon v. Rodriguez

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 2010
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 51919 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)

Opinion

570569/10.

Decided November 10, 2010.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Nelida Malave-Gonzalez, J.), entered March 31, 2010, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ.


Order (Nelida Malave-Gonzalez, J.), entered March 31, 2010, affirmed, with $10 costs.

In opposition to defendant's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue with respect to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). Plaintiff offered no objective medical findings contemporaneous with the motor vehicle accident supporting her claim of serious injury ( see Valentin v Pomilla, 59 AD3d 184; Thompson v Abbasi, 15 AD3d 95), and the unexplained gap of more than one month between the accident and the commencement of treatment interrupted any chain of causation ( see Henry v Peguero, 72 AD3d 600, appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 820). Moreover, plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the cessation of treatment three months after the accident ( see Barner v Shahid, 73 AD3d 593; Cekic v Zapata, 69 AD3d 464).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Grullon v. Rodriguez

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 2010
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 51919 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)
Case details for

Grullon v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE GRULLON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2010

Citations

2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 51919 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)