From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grossman v. United States Atomic Energy Comm

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 13, 1961
289 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 16080.

Argued April 4, 1961.

Decided April 13, 1961.

On Petition for Review of Order of the United States Atomic Energy Commission.

Dr. Cornell Joel Grossman, petitioner pro se.

Miss Kathryn H. Baldwin, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. William H. Orrick, Jr., Messrs. Courts Oulahan, Deputy Gen. Counsel, United States Atomic Energy Commission, and Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for respondents.

Mr. Mark Joelson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered an appearance for respondents.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.


The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F.2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U.S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Grossman v. United States Atomic Energy Comm

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 13, 1961
289 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Grossman v. United States Atomic Energy Comm

Case Details

Full title:Cornell Joel GROSSMAN, D.D.S., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Apr 13, 1961

Citations

289 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1961)