From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Landry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Apr 19, 2019
2:17-CV-00297-LEW (D. Me. Apr. 19, 2019)

Opinion

2:17-CV-00297-LEW

04-19-2019

BRANDON M. GROSS, Plaintiff v. SCOTT R. LANDRY, et al. Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On March 19, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The time within which to file objections expired on April 3, 2019, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Summary Judgment is granted to the remaining Defendants, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Dr. Robert Clinton, Hope Freeman, Cindy McDonough, and Wendy Riebe, on all outstanding claims.

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 19th day of April , 2019.

/s/ Lance E. Walker

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gross v. Landry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Apr 19, 2019
2:17-CV-00297-LEW (D. Me. Apr. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Gross v. Landry

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON M. GROSS, Plaintiff v. SCOTT R. LANDRY, et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Apr 19, 2019

Citations

2:17-CV-00297-LEW (D. Me. Apr. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

Frazier v. Graves

Gross v. Landry, Case No. 2:17-cv-00297-LEW, 2019 WL 1270922, at *9 (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2019), report and…