Opinion
CASE NO.: SC14-80 CASE NO.: SC14-82
10-27-2016
MIRTA GROSECLOSE Petitioner(s) v. APTIUM ONCOLOGY, ETC., ET AL. Respondent(s) APTIUM ONCOLOGY, ETC., ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. MIRTA GROSECLOSE Respondent(s)
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 1D12-3912; 10-021122GCC
Upon review of the response and reply to the Court's Order to Show Cause dated June 29, 2016, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the First District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016).
No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test: /s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court two
Served: MARJORIE GADARIAN GRAHAM
ROBERT J FIORE
EDUARDO E. NERET
JAVIER ANDRES FINLAY
BRAM J GECHTMAN
HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK
WALTER JOSEPH HAVERS JR.
HON. GERARDO CASTIELLO