From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grosch v. Tunica County, Mississippi

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
Oct 31, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV204-P-A (N.D. Miss. Oct. 31, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV204-P-A.

October 31, 2008


ORDER


This matter comes before the court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Extend and Reset Deadline for Filing Petition for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses [137]. Upon due consideration of the motion, the court finds as follows, to-wit:

The court is advised that: (1) Defendants Tunica County and Deputy Sheriff Mosby have no objection to the motion given the plaintiff's claims against him have been fully settled; and (2) Defendant HWCC-Tunica, Inc. has no objection insofar as the motion seeks to extend the petition deadline until after ruling on any post-trial motions, but not until after an appeal is filed. The plaintiff in reply advised the court that he does not object to extending the deadline until after rulings upon post-trial motions rather than after the conclusion of an appeal, if any.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Extend and Reset Deadline for Filing Petition for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses [137] is GRANTED; therefore,

(2) The plaintiff's deadline to file a petition for attorneys' fees and expenses is hereby extended until after rulings upon post-trial motions, if any.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Grosch v. Tunica County, Mississippi

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
Oct 31, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV204-P-A (N.D. Miss. Oct. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Grosch v. Tunica County, Mississippi

Case Details

Full title:ADAM GROSCH, PLAINTIFF, v. TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; TUNICA COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division

Date published: Oct 31, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV204-P-A (N.D. Miss. Oct. 31, 2008)