Opinion
Nos. 02-09-00397-CR, 02-09-00398-CR
Delivered: March 24, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Appealed from Criminal District Court No. 4 of Tarrant County.
PANEL: McCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Appellant Adam Lee Gros appeals the trial court's judgments, which revoked his deferred adjudication community supervision in these assault-family violence cases, adjudicated him guilty, and assessed two years' confinement each, to be served concurrently. Gros's court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel's brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). We gave Gros an opportunity to file a pro se brief, and he has done so. The State declined to file a response. Once an appellant's court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922-23 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and Gros's pro se brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n. 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court's judgments.