Grondorf v. Ingalls

Full title: ROGER E. GRONDORF, Plaintiff, v. RORY INGALLS; et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 7, 2004

No. C 03-1956 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2004)

Opinion

No. C 03-1956 SI (pr)

January 7, 2004

JUDGMENT

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge

This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Roger E. Grondorf, currently in custody at the Napa State Hospital, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court reviewed Grondorfs amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and determined that he could not state a claim for relief based on the revocation of his outpatient status, that he had not pled enough facts for the court to determine that a constitutional violation occurred in his arrest and imprisonment, and that he had not alleged enough information to state a claim for relief based on a state law violation. Grondorf was given leave to amend and ordered to file a third amended complaint no later than October 10, 2003. See Sept. 9, 2003 Order Of Dismissal With Leave To Amend, p. 5. The deadline has passed and the court has received nothing from Grondorf in response to its Order Of Dismissal With Leave To Amend. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk shall close the file. Because this file is now being closed, Grondorf should not file any more documents in it.

IT IS SO ORDERED.