From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimsley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Jul 8, 1994
645 So. 2d 370 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)

Opinion

CR 93-1037.

July 8, 1994.

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court; William Robertson, Judge.

Thomas Grimsley, pro se.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Andrew Redd and Alice Ann Byrne, Dept. of Corrections, for appellee.


This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant, Thomas Grimsley, an inmate of the Alabama prison system, challenges the denial of "retroactive good time."

The appellant was convicted of rape in the second degree on August 10, 1990, and was sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment. He contends that his denial of good time is based on Ala. Code 1975, § 14-9-41(h), which denies good time to sex offenders.

In Brooks v. State, 622 So.2d 447, 451 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), this Court held that "the sex offender exception to § 14-9-41(h) (Supp. 1992) is without rational basis and therefore a violation of equal protection principles."

The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that the circuit court reconsider the petition in light of the principles announced in Brooks.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.


Summaries of

Grimsley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Jul 8, 1994
645 So. 2d 370 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)
Case details for

Grimsley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas GRIMSLEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jul 8, 1994

Citations

645 So. 2d 370 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Bell v. State

The Brooks court remanded the case, noting that the appellant was eligible to be considered for retroactive…