From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimsley v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 13, 2007
954 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2007)

Opinion

No. SC06-2444.

March 13, 2007.

Lower Tribunal No. 5D98-1196.


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grimsley v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 13, 2007
954 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2007)
Case details for

Grimsley v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH L. GRIMSLEY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

954 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2007)

Citing Cases

Grimsley v. Jones

rimsley v. Jones, 177 So.3d 1266 (Fla.2015) (table) (Case No. SC15–1059) (habeas petition dismissed pursuant…