From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 11, 1967
203 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 36526.

October 11, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Robinson Randle, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Mathews, Osborne Ehrlich, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorneys' fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 11, 1967
203 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

Case Details

Full title:JULIA S. GRIMSLEY, PETITIONER, v. THE FLORENCE CRITTENDEN HOME ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 11, 1967

Citations

203 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1967)