From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 8, 2000
754 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D00-0309.

Opinion filed March 8, 2000.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Harold Jeffrey Cohen, Judge; L.T. No. 90-13376CFA02.

Gary W. Grimes, West Palm Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the denial of Gary Grimes' motion for correction of sentence because the failure of the Department of Corrections to award the proper gain time does not make the underlying sentence "illegal" within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) (1999). See, Blakley v. State, 746 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 8, 1999).

Affirmance is without prejudice to Grimes to pursue the appropriate administrative remedy. Duggan v. Department of Corrections, 665 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). We note that Grimes' motion alleged that the jail had not responded to his request for documentation to support his gain time claim. He may file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court if it is necessary to compel the jail to provide that documentation.

GUNTHER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grimes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 8, 2000
754 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Grimes v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY W. GRIMES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 8, 2000

Citations

754 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Curry v. State

Rule 3.800(a) does not afford a remedy because Curry's claim does not make his sentence illegal. See Grimes…