From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 14, 1994
642 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-2143.

September 14, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Martin County, Dwight L. Geiger, J.

Leroy Aaron Grimes, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of an order denying his Rule 3.800(a) motion for correction of sentence to include additional credit for time served. There was no evidentiary hearing, and the trial court failed to attach to its order the portions of the record which it relied on for denial. Here, however, the state filed a response to the motion, and attached a copy of appellant's signed plea agreement which conclusively shows that his motion is without merit. The court stated in its order denying the motion that it had considered the state's response. Under these circumstances we conclude that the trial court's failure to attach to its order the portions of the record relied on for denial of the motion is not reversible error.

We agree with the first district, which came to the same conclusion under similar circumstances, in Bland v. State, 563 So.2d 794 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grimes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 14, 1994
642 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Grimes v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEROY AARON GRIMES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 14, 1994

Citations

642 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Oehling v. State

See Kennedy v. State, 637 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Newton v. State, 527 So.2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).…

Evans v. State

The failure to physically attach the transcript would not have required reversal on this point if the court…