From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grillo v. Harrington

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1985
484 N.E.2d 134 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued August 26, 1985

Decided August 28, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alvin F. Klein, J.

Charles J. Moxley, Jr., for appellants.

Raymond B. Harding for respondents.



In Grillo v Harrington: Order affirmed, without costs. For the reasons stated in Burns v Board of Elections and Liberal Party of State of N.Y. v Board of Elections (both decided herewith) and in Matter of Geller v Board of Elections ( 65 N.Y.2d 956 [decided herewith]), we conclude (1) that the New York County and Kings County County Committees of the Liberal Party were authorized under Liberal Party rules to act together with the concededly properly constituted County Committees of Queens, Richmond and The Bronx to grant Wilson-Pakula authorization to candidate Carol Bellamy, (2) that whether weighted voting or voting by proxy could be used at the authorization meeting has not been preserved for our review, (3) that the certificate of authorization of Bellamy as the Liberal Party candidate for Mayor of New York filed with the City Board of Elections on July 12, 1985 is valid, and (4) that the certificate filed July 15, 1985 purporting to authorize the candidacy of Edward I. Koch for that office is invalid.

In Burns v Board of Elections: Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that challenge to the New York County County Committee of the Liberal Party is barred by Election Law § 16-102 (2).

In Liberal Party of State of N.Y. v Board of Elections: Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the eight district leaders, although not elected as County Committee members, nevertheless constitute members of the New York County County Committee of the Liberal Party ( Matter of Lucitra v Power, 8 N.Y.2d 871, affg 10 A.D.2d 996) and that, with their inclusion, the County Committee was properly organized, there having been no timely challenge to the other 510 members of the Committee ( see, Burns v Board of Elections [decided herewith]).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.


Summaries of

Grillo v. Harrington

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1985
484 N.E.2d 134 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Grillo v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:CARL F. GRILLO, as a Member of the Executive Committee of the Richmond…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 28, 1985

Citations

484 N.E.2d 134 (N.Y. 1985)
484 N.E.2d 134
494 N.Y.S.2d 105

Citing Cases

Matter of Marin v. Board of Elections

Question certified answered in the affirmative. We agree with the dissenters below that the failure to join…

Grillo v. Notaro

Kupferman, J.P., dissents in a memorandum as follows: The plaintiffs-appellants are duly elected members of…