From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grigoryan v. Ashcroft

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 25, 2004
111 F. App'x 524 (9th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

Submitted Oct. 14, 2004.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Garbis N. Etmekjian, Etmekjian Law Offices, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Oil, Suzanne N. Nardone, Washington, DC, for Respondent.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A78-648-815.

Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Hovhannes Grigoryan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision, which affirmed the immigration judge's denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture relief. We dismiss the petition. This court lacks jurisdiction over this petition for review because it was filed more than 30 days after the date of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Sheviakov v. INS, 237 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir.2001).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Grigoryan v. Ashcroft

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 25, 2004
111 F. App'x 524 (9th Cir. 2004)
Case details for

Grigoryan v. Ashcroft

Case Details

Full title:Hovhannes GRIGORYAN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 2004

Citations

111 F. App'x 524 (9th Cir. 2004)