Opinion
Argued January 16, 1893
Decided January 24, 1893
Melville C. Day for motion.
William H. Arnoux and John H. Post opposed.
EARL, J., reads for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Griggs v. Day
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1893
32 N.E. 1001 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Griggs v. Day
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1893
32 N.E. 1001 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Griggs v. Day
Case Details
Full title:CLARK R. GRIGGS, Respondent, v . MELVILLE C. DAY et al., as Surviving…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 24, 1893
Citations
32 N.E. 1001 (N.Y. 1893)
32 N.E. 1001
50 N.Y. St. Rptr. 87
Citing Cases
Wasserstrom v. Interstate Litho Corp.
Initially, we note that the settlement documents could not create a novation inasmuch as the original…
Craig J. Duchossois Revocable Trust UAD 9/11/1989 v. CDx Laboratories, Inc.Furthermore, the requisite elements of a novation, each of which must be present ( Griggs v. Day, 136 N.Y.…