From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Workman

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 27, 2008
Case No. CIV-08-78-M (W.D. Okla. May. 27, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-78-M.

May 27, 2008


ORDER


On April 28, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 19, 2008. A review of the file reveals no objection has been filed.

Accordingly, upon de novo review, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 28, 2008;
(2) DENIES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and
(3) ORDERS that judgment in favor of respondent issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Griffith v. Workman

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 27, 2008
Case No. CIV-08-78-M (W.D. Okla. May. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Griffith v. Workman

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY DON GRIFFITH, Petitioner, v. RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-78-M (W.D. Okla. May. 27, 2008)