Opinion
1:20-CV-6505 (CM)
09-15-2020
BRANDON GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. CLARKSTOWN POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR AMENDED IFP FOR RELEASED PRISONER :
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, was incarcerated in the Auburn Correctional Facility when he filed this action. He was, therefore, a "prisoner" as defined in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) when he filed this action, and is subject to the PLRA's restrictions. See Gibson v. City Municipality of N.Y., 692 F.3d 198, 201 (2d Cir. 2012) ("[T]he relevant time at which a person must be 'a prisoner' within the meaning of the PLRA in order for the Act's restrictions to apply is 'the moment the plaintiff files his complaint.'") (citation omitted). Under the PLRA, a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP), for example: (1) must pay the $350.00 filing fee in installments withdrawn from his prison trust fund account, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); and (2) can be disqualified from proceeding IFP, that is, without prepaying the filing fee, if he has previously filed three federal civil actions (or appeals), while he was a prisoner, that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, § 1915(g) (the "three strikes" rule).
Under the PLRA, a prisoner is "any person incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms and conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or [a] diversionary program." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h).
A plaintiff who was a prisoner at the time of filing his complaint is also required to have exhausted available prison administrative remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).
Before resolving Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP, the Court ascertained from public records that he has been released from incarceration and is now under parole supervision. Upon a prisoner's release, "his obligation to pay fees is to be determined, like any non-prisoner, solely by whether he qualifies for [IFP] status." McGann v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 96 F.3d 28, 30 (2d Cir. 1996). "A released prisoner may litigate without further prepayment of fees upon satisfying the poverty affidavit requirement applicable to all non-prisoners." Id.
Because Plaintiff has been released from incarceration and is now under parole supervision, his financial situation may have changed. Thus, if Plaintiff wishes to prosecute this action and proceed IFP, he must complete and submit an amended IFP application within thirty days. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $400.00 in relevant fees, which includes the $350.00 filing fee and a $50.00 administrative fee that applies to litigants who are not proceeding IFP. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice to Plaintiff's refiling the action.
Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss this action if Plaintiff fails to do so. Under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a district court may dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute after notifying the plaintiff. LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001); see Abdallah v. Ragner, No. 12-CV-8840, 2013 WL 7118083, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 22, 2013) ("A plaintiff is required to notify the Court when his address changes, and failure to do so is sufficient to justify dismissal of a plaintiff's complaint."). Accordingly, the Court also directs Plaintiff to update his address of record within thirty days of the date of this order.
Because Plaintiff is no longer in custody and has failed to update the Court as to his current mailing address, the Court has directed the Clerk of Court to change Plaintiff's address of record so that it is the office of the Senior Parole Officer and Parole Officer assigned to supervise him.
CONCLUSION
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees that are required to file a civil action in this Court or complete and submit the attached amended IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the amended IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 1:20-CV-6505 (CM). Plaintiff must also update his address of record within thirty days of the date of this order.
No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice to Plaintiff's refiling this action.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2020
New York, New York
/s/_________
COLLEEN McMAHON
Chief United States District Judge