From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffis v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 7, 1968
217 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. K-69.

November 7, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, W.L. Wadsworth, J.

Angus W. Harriett, Palatka, for appellant.

Dowda, Millican Miller, Palatka, and McClure, Wigginton McClure, Tallahassee, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a final judgment based upon a jury verdict in an action for damages. The main point of contention is the inadequateness of the verdict and judgment. Motion for new trial was denied.

It appears from the evidence that actual medical expenses of approximately $797.90 was proved as the only evidence of tangible damages. The jury verdict was for $1785.00

Inasmuch as the jury fixed the amount of its verdict at a figure in excess of proven medical expenses, presumably for any and all other damages accruing to the claimant, including pain and suffering and loss of earnings, we feel compelled to affirm under the authority of City of Miami v. Smith, 165 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1964) and Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So.2d 641 (Fla. 1964).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C.J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Griffis v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 7, 1968
217 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Griffis v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH W. GRIFFIS, APPELLANT, v. EVELYN LONG PRYLE HILL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 7, 1968

Citations

217 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Short v. Grossman

" (page 711) The District Court in Griffis v. Hill, 217 So.2d 358 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968), in affirming an…

Grossman v. Short

In Griffis v. Hill, supra, the plaintiff in a personal injury action showed medical expenses of $797.90, and…