From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffis v. Brunk

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jun 29, 2022
1:21-cv-00070 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00070

06-29-2022

JORDYN GRIFFIS Plaintiff, v. MARY E. BRUNK and BOTTOMLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. Defendants.


HOLMES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 18) recommending Defendant Mary Brunk be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) and 21.

The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation were to be filed within fourteen days of service (Doc. No. 18 at 3). No objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendant Mary Brunk is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) and 21.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Griffis v. Brunk

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jun 29, 2022
1:21-cv-00070 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Griffis v. Brunk

Case Details

Full title:JORDYN GRIFFIS Plaintiff, v. MARY E. BRUNK and BOTTOMLEY ENTERPRISES, INC…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00070 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)