From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Wintle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Apr 11, 2016
No. 1:15-cv-00435-GZS (D. Me. Apr. 11, 2016)

Opinion

No. 1:15-cv-00435-GZS

04-11-2016

ANTHONY M. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff v. JEREMY WINTLE, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 28, 2016, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 26) on April 4, 2016.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 22) is DENIED. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve Defendant personally in accordance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
3. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery (ECF No. 21) is DENIED without prejudice.

/s/ George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge Dated this 11th day of April, 2016.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Wintle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Apr 11, 2016
No. 1:15-cv-00435-GZS (D. Me. Apr. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Griffin v. Wintle

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY M. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff v. JEREMY WINTLE, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

No. 1:15-cv-00435-GZS (D. Me. Apr. 11, 2016)