From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 19, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1068-P (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1068-P

11-19-2020

BRYANT GRIFFIN, Petitioner v. WARDEN, Respondent


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 7), and after a de novo review of the record, including the "Supplemental Order" (ECF No. 8) filed by Petitioner, having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 5) is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, WITH PREJUDICE as to the jurisdictional issue, but WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the merits of the claim.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers, this 19th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Griffin v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 19, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1068-P (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Griffin v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:BRYANT GRIFFIN, Petitioner v. WARDEN, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-1068-P (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2020)

Citing Cases

Sylvester v. Warden of Fed. Corr. Inst.

Even if Rehaif applied retroactively, Griffin's claim would still fail because Rehaif would not establish…