From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 16, 2012
101 So. 3d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 1D12–0232.

2012-11-16

Lordcedric GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge. LordCedric Griffin, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge.
LordCedric Griffin, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

The appellant's rule 3.850 motion is facially sufficient to assert a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to the extent that it alleges a failure to move for a judgment of acquittal on the charged offense of burglary with damage in excess of $1,000.00. The record before us contains no evidence that the damage exceeded $1,000.00 or that there was otherwise a valid reason why counsel did not raise this issue at trial. Consequently, we reverse the order summarily denying the motion and remand the case to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim or an evidentiary hearing.

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Griffin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 16, 2012
101 So. 3d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Griffin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lordcedric GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

101 So. 3d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)