From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Sandberg

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 6, 2024
23-cv-04047-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04047-JSC

02-06-2024

CHICORY GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. SHERYL SANDBERG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 19, 2023, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to present a claim that is capable of judicial determination or review. Plaintiff was granted until January 18, 2024, to file an amended complaint, and cautioned that if he failed to do so, this case would be dismissed without prejudice. (ECF No. 10 at 4:18-19.) The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's order. As Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint by the deadline, shown cause why not, or requested an extension of time, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary).

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Sandberg

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 6, 2024
23-cv-04047-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Griffin v. Sandberg

Case Details

Full title:CHICORY GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. SHERYL SANDBERG, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 6, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04047-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)