From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Sacramento Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-00185 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-00185 JFM (PC)

04-17-2013

LEONARD GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a county jail inmate, proceeding without counsel or "pro se," with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, the only party to appear in the above-captioned case, filed a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See ECF No. 3.

By an order filed February 21, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file either an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed either an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

____________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Griffin v. Sacramento Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-00185 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Griffin v. Sacramento Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-00185 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)