(“The ADA is not applicable to the tax court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, or any other federal government entity because the ADA definition of ‘public entity' includes only state and local government entities.”), aff'd, 590 Fed.Appx. 1000 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Henrickson v. Potter, 327 F.3d 444, 447 (5th Cir. 2003) (stating that “the entire federal government is excluded from the coverage of the ADA”); Cellular Phone Taskforce v. F.C.C., 217 F.3d 72, 73 (2d Cir. 2000) (“Title II of the ADA is not applicable to the federal government.”); Griffin v. Hooks, No. 3:19-CV-00135-MR, 2023 WL 5662584, at *4 (W.D. N.C. Aug. 30, 2023) (stating that ADA does not apply to the federal judiciary); Melton v. Freeland, No. 1:96-CV-516, 1997 WL 382054, at *1 (M.D. N.C. Feb. 6, 1997) (explaining that the ADA does not apply to federal courts, which are not public entities under the Act).