From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 3, 2013
110 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D12–3286.

2013-04-3

Prince Jamala GREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562007CF002416A. Prince Jamala Grey, Monticello, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562007CF002416A.
Prince Jamala Grey, Monticello, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

This is appellant's second post-conviction appeal challenging his sentence as outside the sentencing guidelines when the guidelines do not apply. Because appellant has filed successive motions and appeals raising or attempting to re-litigate meritless claims, he is cautioned that filing any further frivolous pleadings may result in the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.

POLEN, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 3, 2013
110 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Grey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Prince Jamala GREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

110 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)