From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grewal v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 2, 2024
3:23-cv-05643-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-05643-JSC

02-02-2024

PREET GREWAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Preet Grewal and Evergreen Auto Care, Inc. dba Integrity Automotive Service “(Evergreen Auto Care”) allege two counts: (1) negligence against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and (2) fraud against Does 6-10. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) Chase moved to dismiss Plaintiff's negligence claim. (Dkt. No. 10.) The Court granted Chase's motion with leave to amend and ordered Plaintiffs to file any amended complaint on or before January 23, 2024. (Dkt. No. 25 at 4.)

Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. So, the Court DISMISSES the claims against Chase with prejudice. As Plaintiffs have not moved to amend to substitute an actual party for the Doe Defendants, the claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Grewal v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 2, 2024
3:23-cv-05643-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Grewal v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:PREET GREWAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-05643-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2024)