From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gress v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 12, 2015
No. 2:13-cv-0328 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0328 TLN KJN P

05-12-2015

MICHAEL GRESS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, M.D., et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed March 4, 2015, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Col. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Col be dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 12, 2015

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/gres0328.fusm2


Summaries of

Gress v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 12, 2015
No. 2:13-cv-0328 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Gress v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GRESS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, M.D., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0328 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2015)