Opinion
CIVIL NO. 07-669-JPG.
August 10, 2009
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)(d). (Doc. 39). In that Motion, Defendants argue that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required by 32 U.S.C. § 1997E(a). Limited discovery was conducted concerning the issue. Defendants then filed a Motion to Dismiss and Request a Pavey Hearing (Doc. 77) in which they reiterated their position that Plaintiff's suit should be dismissed because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Magistrate Judge Clifford Proud set the second motion for a hearing to be held on August 28, 2009. The Court finds that Defendants's original Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 39) is superseded by their second Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 77). Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot Defendants's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)(d). (Doc. 39).