From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, LTD

Supreme Court of Utah
Mar 4, 1987
735 P.2d 33 (Utah 1987)

Opinion

No. 870017.

March 4, 1987.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Timothy R. Hanson, J.

Byron L. Stubbs, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Dennis C. Ferguson, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.


ORDER


In his docketing statement to this Court, counsel for appellant stated that "[j]urisdiction to hear this appeal is conferred on this Court by Rule 3, U.R.A.P." We informed counsel by telephone that our appellate rules do not confer jurisdiction and requested that he amend the docketing statement, citing section 78-2-2 of the Judicial Code. His failure to comply with our request constrains us to dismiss the appeal. Utah R.App.P. 9(e).

In all cases appealed after January 1, 1987, reference to § 78-2-2 (1986 Cum.Supp.) above will be considered insufficient; instead the appropriate subsection must be included to alert this Court that it has original appellate jurisdiction over the case.

So ordered.

STEWART, C.J., does not participate herein.


Summaries of

Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, LTD

Supreme Court of Utah
Mar 4, 1987
735 P.2d 33 (Utah 1987)
Case details for

Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, LTD

Case Details

Full title:DONALD H. GREGORY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. FOURTHWEST INVESTMENTS…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Mar 4, 1987

Citations

735 P.2d 33 (Utah 1987)

Citing Cases

LE v. UTAH LABOR COMM

The Utah Supreme Court has ruled that docketing statements must fully comply with rule 9 of the Utah Rules of…

Brooks v. Department of Employment Security

Failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal, particularly when counsel ignores our request that…