Opinion
February 13, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that in order to grant summary judgment, it must clearly appear that no material issue of fact has been presented. Issue finding rather than issue determination is the key. Since summary judgment is the procedural equivalent of a trial, any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue, or where a material issue of fact is arguable, requires denial of summary judgment (see, Salino v. IPT Trucking, 203 A.D.2d 352; Museums at Stony Brook v. Village of Patchogue Fire Dept., 146 A.D.2d 572).
We have reviewed the record and agree with the Supreme Court's determination. The indemnity provisions of the subcontract between the respondent Rice Mohawk U.S. Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Rice Mohawk), and the appellant DeFoe Corp. (hereinafter DeFoe), when read in conjunction with the terms of the indemnity policy that Rice Mohawk obtained from respondent New York Marine General Insurance Company (hereinafter New York Marine) (see, Lavanant v. General Acc. Ins. Co., 79 N.Y.2d 623) raise issues of fact regarding the alleged breach by Rice Mohawk of its duty to defend and indemnify DeFoe as an additional insured under the policy issued by New York Marine in the main action brought on behalf of Rice Mohawk's deceased employee (see, Smith v. Cassadaga Val. School Dist., 178 A.D.2d 955). Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.