From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gregorio v. J.M. Dennis Construction Co. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 2004
13 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-09397

December 20, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated September 19, 2003, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action to recover damages for violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Before: Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). In opposition, the defendant J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp. raised a triable issue of fact as to the proximate cause of the subject accident ( see Cajamarca v. Interconex, Inc., 8 AD3d 602; Aslam v. Weiss, 308 AD2d 426; Castronovo v. Doe, 274 AD2d 442; Skalko v. Marshall's Inc., 229 AD2d 569, 570-571). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action to recover damages for violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gregorio v. J.M. Dennis Construction Co. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 2004
13 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Gregorio v. J.M. Dennis Construction Co. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ELIAS M. GREGORIO, Appellant, v. J.M. DENNIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 93

Citing Cases

Makaj v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

In response, however, the defendant raised a triable issue of fact by demonstrating through the deposition…

Guaman v. Ginestri

The defendant Antonio Ginestri testified at an examination before trial, in substance, that the plaintiff…