From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greer v. Bank of Am.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 18, 2013
No. 05-13-01288-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-13-01288-CV

11-18-2013

BILLY GREER, Appellant v. BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee


DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 18, 2013

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-4095-C


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices FitzGerald, Francis, and Myers

Opinion by Justice Francis

In a letter dated October 9, 2013, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, it appeared that the trial court's judgment did not injure appellant. We requested appellant to file a jurisdictional brief, within ten days, addressing the Court's concern. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a jurisdictional brief within the time requested may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today's date, appellant has not filed a jurisdictional brief.

Generally, an appeal may be brought only by parties who have been injured by the trial court's judgment. See Jack Jones Hearing Ctrs., Inc. v. State Comm. of Exam'rs in Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments, 363 S.W.3d 911, 914 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012, no pet.). An appellant does not have standing and this Court does not have jurisdiction over an appeal of an order that does not injure an appellant. See Texas Ass'n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 443 (Tex. 1993) (standing is implicit in the concept of subject matter jurisdiction which is essential to a court's authority to decide a case).

In this case, the justice court signed a judgment in the forcible detainer action. Appellant appealed that judgment by filing an appeal bond. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 749 & 749c. The effect of the appeal bond is to obtain a trial de novo in the county court at law. The justice court's judgment was vacated by filing the appeal bond. See In re Garza, 990 S.W.2d 372, 374 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1999, orig. proceeding). Subsequently, the county court at law dismissed the case for want of prosecution. The dismissal by the county court at law after the appeal was perfected was a dismissal of the entire case and left the matter standing as if no lawsuit had been filed. See id.

Thus, the order appealed did not injure appellant. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 131288F.P05

_______________

MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

BILLY GREER, Appellant

V.
BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee
No. 05-13-01288-CV

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-4095-C.

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.

Justices FitzGerald and Myers, participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, BANK OF AMERICA, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, BILLY GREER.

_______________

MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Greer v. Bank of Am.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 18, 2013
No. 05-13-01288-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Greer v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:BILLY GREER, Appellant v. BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Nov 18, 2013

Citations

No. 05-13-01288-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 18, 2013)