From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

November, 1912.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Miller and Dowling, JJ.


A receiver of the rents and profits of mortgaged premises cannot resort to contempt proceedings to compel tenants of the owner to pay rent. ( American Mortgage Company v. Sire, 103 App. Div. 396; Guerrier v. Coleman, 135 id. 46.) As the order appealed from can serve no purpose except to lay the foundation for contempt proceedings, it is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman

Case Details

Full title:THE GREENWICH SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v . LOUIS SILVERMAN and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1912

Citations

153 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Citing Cases

Rosenthal v. Gingold Realty Company

The action was begun October 3, 1916, and the order appointing the receiver was made October 4, 1916. The…

Broadview Traders, Inc., v. Ramdee Realty

It has been held that a receiver of the rents and profits of mortgaged premises cannot resort to these…