From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenwald v. Bullock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1937
252 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

October 18, 1937.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.


Action to impress a trust upon a fifty-share building and loan certificate. Judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. In an equity action where the defect in the plaintiff's proof is due to quality rather than quantum, the court may make a decision dismissing the complaint on the merits. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482; McNulty Brothers v. Offerman, 141 App. Div. 730, 732.) Ordinarily this may occur only where a defendant has rested, but parties may so conduct themselves that their acts are equivalent to resting without giving any evidence. Here the defendants' conduct was equivalent to resting without the giving of any evidence, the court having indicated that it did not believe plaintiff's evidence in view of the documentary proof which it accredited. The trial court, under the circumstances, properly refused to believe the plaintiff's version of the transaction upon which her claim was founded.


Summaries of

Greenwald v. Bullock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1937
252 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Greenwald v. Bullock

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE GREENWALD, Appellant, v. WILLIAM G. BULLOCK, CLIFF H. MORRIS and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1937

Citations

252 App. Div. 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Marino v. Alliaud

A defendant is entitled to have the case decided on the merits by the trial court upon the evidence at the…