Opinion
June 3, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feinberg, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying her motion to vacate the prior order entered on her default, since the appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense ( see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Fennell v Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599; Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.