From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenlaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 757 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76677.

May 9, 2000.

APPEAL FROM: MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. PHILIP J. SWEENEY, JUDGE.

S. Paige Canfield, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Appeal Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.



ORDER


Sherrod Greenlaw (Movant) appeals the judgment denying on the merits without a hearing his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Greenlaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 757 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Greenlaw v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHERROD GREENLAW, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: May 9, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 757 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)