Opinion
February 20, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We find that the court properly granted summary judgment since the moving defendants proffered sufficient evidence to demonstrate that no triable issue of fact existed and the plaintiffs' papers in opposition were insufficient to demonstrate otherwise ( see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Sullivan, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.