Opinion
09-26-2017
Lindsey GREEN, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Megan ZARELLA, et al., Defendants–Appellants.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Fay Ng of counsel), for appellants. Edelman, Krasin & Jaye, PLLC, Westbury (Kara M. Rosen of counsel), for respondent.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Fay Ng of counsel), for appellants.
Edelman, Krasin & Jaye, PLLC, Westbury (Kara M. Rosen of counsel), for respondent.
SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, KAPNICK, KERN, MOULTON, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered October 19, 2015, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.
Defendants demonstrated that defendant police officer was engaged in an "emergency operation" within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104, by submitting evidence that the officer was responding to a radio call about a "man with a gun" when her police vehicle struck plaintiff (see Criscione v. City of New York, 97 N.Y.2d 152, 736 N.Y.S.2d 656, 762 N.E.2d 342 [2001] ; VTL §§ 114–b, 101 ). Defendants' evidence also showed that the officer was engaged in conduct privileged under the statute at the time of the accident, since her vehicle straddled and then crossed the double yellow lines, in disregard of regulations "governing directions of movement" ( VTL § 1104[b][4] ). Accordingly, defendants demonstrated that the officer's conduct is to be assessed under the statute's "reckless disregard" standard ( VTL § 1104[e] ; Frezzell v. City of New York, 24 N.Y.3d 213, 217, 997 N.Y.S.2d 367, 21 N.E.3d 1028 [2014], affg. 105 A.D.3d 620, 963 N.Y.S.2d 637 [1st Dept.2013] ; Kabir v. County of Monroe, 16 N.Y.3d 217, 220, 920 N.Y.S.2d 268, 945 N.E.2d 461 [2011] ; Asante v. Asante, 135 A.D.3d 562, 22 N.Y.S.3d 848 [1st Dept.2016] ).
Defendants further demonstrated that the officer did not operate the police vehicle in reckless disregard for the safety of others (see VTL § 1104 [e]; Kabir, 16 N.Y.3d 217, 920 N.Y.S.2d 268, 945 N.E.2d 461 ; Saarinen v. Kerr, 84 N.Y.2d 494, 620 N.Y.S.2d 297, 644 N.E.2d 988 [1994] ). The officer testified that traffic warranted moving her vehicle left and operating it on the double yellow lines to avoid the stopped vehicles to her right and ahead of her. The officer had no duty to engage her sirens or lights, as she was operating a police vehicle, and her failure to do so was not evidence of recklessness (see VTL § 1104[c] ; Frezzell, 105 A.D.3d at 621, 963 N.Y.S.2d 637 ). Moreover, the officer testified that she attempted to avoid plaintiff, who was standing on the double yellow lines, by swerving behind her, an assertion that plaintiff supported with her own testimony (see Asante, 135 A.D.3d at 562, 22 N.Y.S.3d 848).
In opposition, plaintiff failed to present evidence showing that there was no emergency, and failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the officer acted in reckless disregard for the safety of others.