From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 8, 1998
714 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-00656

July 8, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Raymond O. Gross, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Assistant Attorney General, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Luther Green challenges his conviction for residential burglary. Because we find a fatal variance between the information and the State's evidence at trial, we reverse.

Green was charged by information with burglary of property located at 3724 Manatee Drive belonging to Larry Couch. At trial, Barbara Couch testified that she had been the victim of the burglary. No mention of Larry Couch was made in the testimony. Further, Ms. Couch testified that her address was 4724 Manatee Drive. Compounding this problem is the fact that the police witnesses identified the address as being "two doors down" from 3774 Manatee Drive. Undoubtedly recognizing one of the variances, the State moved to amend the information to include Barbara Couch's name. In denying the State's request, the court specifically identified the State's failure to indicate a relationship between Larry and Barbara Couch. Nevertheless, the State attributed ownership in its closing argument to Larry and Barbara Couch and the same ownership was set forth in the judgment and sentence.

The variances in this case led to Green's conviction for a crime other than the one charged in the information and leaves him subject to the danger of further prosecution. Green's conviction for an uncharged offense is fundamental error. See Jacob v. State, 651 So.2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Rose v. State, 507 So.2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Salerno v. State, 347 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

We reverse Green's conviction for burglary and remand with instructions to discharge him on that offense. Green's conviction for dealing in stolen property is not affected by this reversal; however, resentencing may be appropriate if one scoresheet was used for both offenses.

PARKER, C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 8, 1998
714 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUTHER GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 8, 1998

Citations

714 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Wells v. State

We are not convinced that there was a misnomer and since the issue was not raised below, the record was not…

State v. Holt

This court has no way of knowing what Detective Emrich was going to say. For purposes of preserving error,…