From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 5, 2016
184 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5014.

02-05-2016

Deshawn GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Deshawn Green, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Deshawn Green, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Rivera v. Dep't of Health, 177 So.3d 1, 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“Now, under rule 9.420(a)(2), in order to receive the benefit of the mailbox rule, an inmate housed in an institution that has a system designed for handling legal mail which provides a way to record when the document was relinquished to institution officials for mailing, must use that system.”)

OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Green v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 5, 2016
184 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:DESHAWN GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

184 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)