From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 23, 2023
4:20CV001449-JM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 23, 2023)

Opinion

4:20CV001449-JM

01-23-2023

QUENTIN KYLE GREEN, PETITIONER v. DEXTER PAYNE RESPONDENT


ORDER

JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After careful review of the findings and recommendations, the timely objections and response to the objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety. Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). Because the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability, it certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3)(A).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Green v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 23, 2023
4:20CV001449-JM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Green v. Payne

Case Details

Full title:QUENTIN KYLE GREEN, PETITIONER v. DEXTER PAYNE RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 23, 2023

Citations

4:20CV001449-JM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 23, 2023)