From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Concordia University

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Sep 8, 2010
09-CV-1519-AC (D. Or. Sep. 8, 2010)

Opinion

09-CV-1519-AC.

September 8, 2010

GLENN N. SOLOMON, Glenn N. Solomon, Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, Attorney for Plaintiff.

PAULA A. BARRAN, Barran Liebman LLP, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#22) on June 23, 2010, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendant Concordia University's Motion (#5) to Dismiss.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#22). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#5) to Dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Green v. Concordia University

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Sep 8, 2010
09-CV-1519-AC (D. Or. Sep. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Green v. Concordia University

Case Details

Full title:CATHY ANN GREEN, Plaintiff, v. CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY, an Oregon non-profit…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2010

Citations

09-CV-1519-AC (D. Or. Sep. 8, 2010)