From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. City of Chelsea

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Oct 14, 1970
263 N.E.2d 444 (Mass. 1970)

Opinion

October 14, 1970.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Walter S. Krzewicki for George H. Caron another.

Robert J. Muldoon, Jr., for the petitioners.


The Greens seek to register Chelsea land (the locus) lying southeast of a parcel (parcel A) previously registered by them. Certain maps referred to in the Land Court judge's decision indicate that a way known as Gillooly Road runs through the locus and parcel A at and near the boundary. The respondents, including owners of parcels on Gillooly Road southwest of the locus, assert an easement over that road within the locus. The Land Court judge in his decision found that, on the locus and parcel A, Gillooly Road is an ungraded, hilly piece of land covered with grass, "never . . . wrongly on the ground," impassable for vehicles, and difficult to use on foot. He concluded that the respondents had no easement by grant or by prescription over the locus. Upon the limited review open on appeal, his findings and decision are conclusive in the absence of error of law apparent on the record. See Harrington v. Anderson, 316 Mass. 187, 191-193. No such error appeals. A broader review by a bill of exceptions has not been sought. The respondents, as appellants, would have greatly assisted this court by including in their brief an informative sketch map of the area, based upon the exhibits, as required by S.J.C. Rule 1:15 (5), 351 Mass. 740.

Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

Green v. City of Chelsea

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Oct 14, 1970
263 N.E.2d 444 (Mass. 1970)
Case details for

Green v. City of Chelsea

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GREEN another vs. CITY OF CHELSEA others

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Oct 14, 1970

Citations

263 N.E.2d 444 (Mass. 1970)
263 N.E.2d 444

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Ebacher

Nor can it be said that this finding is inconsistent with other findings set out in the decision. Only such…

Simons v. Inyo Cerro Gordo Mining & Power Co.

reputation was confined to cases of pedigree, prescription, custom, boundary, and matters of general and…