From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Bauer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. 1:08-cv-249 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cv-249.

January 12, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed December 9, 2008 (Doc. 36).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.


Summaries of

Green v. Bauer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. 1:08-cv-249 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Green v. Bauer

Case Details

Full title:Ronald C. Green, Plaintiff v. Officer William Bauer, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 12, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cv-249 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Lunt v. Frost Shades Franchising, LLC

. Green v. Bauer, No. 1:08-CV-249, 2009 WL 88609, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2009) (citing State of Ohio…

Heritage Glob. Network L. A. v. Welch

“Monetary or economic harm by itself” typically “does not constitute irreparable harm” for the purposes of a…