Summary
awarding prejudgment interest where "Defendant has neither proven Plaintiffs unduly delayed in filing suit or that they have been prejudiced."
Summary of this case from Am. Tech. Ceramics Corp. v. Presidio Components, Inc.Opinion
2018-1725 2018-1784
07-12-2019
JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-cross-appellants. Also represented by BENJAMIN THOMAS SIROLLY; JUSTIN ADATTO NELSON, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX; MATTHEW ROBERT BERRY, JOHN EDWARD SCHILTZ, Seattle, WA. STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW D. SATCHWELL, Chicago, IL; KATHRYN RILEY GRASSO, Washington, DC; BRIAN BIGGS, Wilmington, DE.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00392-GMS, Judge Gregory M. Sleet.
JUDGMENT
JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-cross-appellants. Also represented by BENJAMIN THOMAS SIROLLY; JUSTIN ADATTO NELSON, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX; MATTHEW ROBERT BERRY, JOHN EDWARD SCHILTZ, Seattle, WA. STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW D. SATCHWELL, Chicago, IL; KATHRYN RILEY GRASSO, Washington, DC; BRIAN BIGGS, Wilmington, DE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 12, 2019
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court