Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Great Western Sav. v. George W. Easley

778 P.2d 569 (Alaska 1989)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Great Western Sav. v. George W. Easley

4 Citing cases

  1. Thomas, Head Greisen Employees Tr. v. Buster

    95 F.3d 1449 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that contempt order did not violate due process where, although district court did not hold evidentiary hearing, contemnors “had ample notice and an opportunity to respond to the possibility that the court would find them in contempt” and did not request an evidentiary hearing

    Id. at 1079 n. 4. Similarly, in Great Western Savings Bank v. George W. Easley Co., 778 P.2d 569 (Alaska 1989), the trial court entered an order subordinating a construction lender's deed of trust to a general contractor's mechanics' lien. On appeal, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that, because it was affirming a money judgment against the lender, "the order of subordination can be viewed as an order in aid of collection of the judgment which is within the inherent power of the court."

  2. Lockhart v. Draper

    209 P.3d 1025 (Alaska 2009)   Cited 3 times
    Noting that "actual damages are not an essential element of a fraudulent conveyance action"

    Cf. Hutka, 102 P.3d at 960; Bobich, 843 P.2d at 1236. In Great Western Savings Bank v. George W. Easley Co., 778 P.2d 569 (Alaska 1989), we concluded an error "not raised in the trial court and . . . not raised on appeal" was "thus not grounds for reversing the judgment." Id. at 579.

  3. Nerox Power Sys. v. M-B Contr. Co.

    54 P.3d 791 (Alaska 2002)   Cited 27 times
    Affirming conclusion that companies were “mere instrumentalities” of shareholders where there was evidence of five of the six factors

    "White v. State ex rel. Block, 597 P.2d 172, 176 n. 13 (Alaska 1979) (quoting 6 Harold Remington, A Treatise on the Bankruptcy Law of the United States § 2874 (5th ed. 1952)); see also Great Western Sav. Bank v. George W. Easley Co., 778 P.2d 569, 581 (Alaska 1989).White, 597 P.2d at 175-76.

  4. Ellis-Walker Builders, Inc. v. Don Reynolds

    695 S.E.2d 832 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 1 times
    Applying dicta as persuasive authority

    See Woodford v. Glenville State College Housing Corp., 225 S.E.2d 671, 675 n. 6 (W. Va. 1976) ("the lien procedure provided for mechanics and materialmen is a cumulative remedy, and independently of the lien, such parties may resort to the ordinary common-law remedies, as by an action to recover a personal judgment. The two remedies may be pursued simultaneously, but there can be only one satisfaction."); see also Madison Highlands Dev. Co. v. Dean Son Plumbing Co., 415 So. 2d 1129 (Ala. Civ. App. 1982); Great W. Sav. Bank v. George W. Easley Co., 778 P.2d 569 (Alaska 1989); Phoenix Title Trust Co. v. Garrett, 237 P.2d 470 (Ariz. 1951); Robinson v. Peardon, 247 P.2d 83 (1952); Hayutin v. Gibbons, 338 P.2d 1032 (Colo.